I am Emily Brumbaugh.
I am surprised that some seem to know the situation better than I do.
However, none of that matters now because it is over.
There are few things that should be known with regard to this case.
1- My husband’s only INTENT was to get our children back. Think about how you might react if your wife was screaming at you to give her the phone; they won't give me my kids! The police had not arrived at this point. We were frantic! Please, even if you know this could never happen to you, imagine a stranger having your child and your second child being removed farther away from you by another stranger.
2- If you feel the need to debate time lines I would gladly give you my cell phone records and memories of that day. They replay day and night all the time. We were gone 1 hour and 10 minutes.
3- We felt the entire situation needed to be taken into consideration. Were it not for the entire picture we would NEVER have reacted that way. This includes the fact that my husband was trying to get 2 kids, not just one. Lloyd had Jackson and his parental instinct was to get Reuben, not to come into conflict with the officer.
4-The opposing parties involved in court wanted all events leading up to the police arriving to be considered irrelevant. The focus for them was strictly the seconds from the time the Deputy arrived until Lloyd was tasered.
5- We believe the jury tried to be fair based on instructions and the law. They were informed not to take anything else into consideration. Included in that omission was the fact that Lloyd’s intention was to get his children from what we viewed as a dangerous situation.
6- He is convicted of a felony. He could face up to 2 years in prison and/or a $2,000 fine among the many other court fees. These few seconds in our lives will continue to be very expensive.
7- We feel that the law which makes this a felony should be revised. The law considers all very violent offenses against a police officer as well as unintended offenses to be a felony. It doesn't allow for your intentions to be taken into consideration. We would love for the law to be split into two parts. A felony would involve an intentional attack or harming of a police officer . A misdemeanor would include unintended or incidental contact or actions WHERE THE POLICE OFFICER IS NOT HURT ANY WAY.
8-Please learn from our situation. Based on our experience, if a police officer initiates contact, it may be considered an assault if you try to remove yourself from that contact. Basically according to current law, DO NOT TOUCH a police officer EVER! That includes if you have no intention or desire to hurt them. That may be considered an assault if they decide to press charges. Also, if your desire is to rescue your child from a dangerous situation, the police have a right to stop you from doing that. If they tell you to stop and you don't stop dead in your tracks that may be considered resisting and obstructing.
9- For those of you judging our lawyer based on the unflattering picture; he was great and represented us very well. Have you never had a bad picture taken of you?
10- If you believe in a God or any higher power. Please say prayers for all parties involved. There is a power there beyond any human strength. I know at least our family could use prayers. It is very difficult to explain this situation to our children when they think their Dad will be shot and never come home again.